Inst.of Advanced  
Studies, UN University
Integrated Bio-Systems in Zero Emissions Applications
Proceedings of the Internet Conference on Integrated Bio-Systems  
Editors: Eng-Leong Foo & Tarcisio Della Senta. 1998
http://www.ias.unu.edu/proceedings/icibs
.
Studies on Duck Production in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam
Bui Xuan Men,* Brian Ogle and** T.R. Preston***
*Faculty of Agric., Cantho Univ. Cantho, Vietnam. <bxmen@ctu.edu.vn>; **Dept of Animal Nutrition and Management, Swedish Univ. of Agric.Sci., Uppsala, Sweden, ***Finca Ecologica, Univ of Agric.& Forestry, Thuduc, Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam
 
Abstract 

Five experiments were carried out both on station and on small farms in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam to evaluate the use of duckweed as a replacement for soyabeans in broken rice based diets for growing ducks, and to determine the effects of feed supplementation of scavenging ducks. 

The two first experiments were carried out with crossbred common ducks on station, and with Muscovy ducks on a small farm. The ducks were fed broken rice diets, in which soyabeans were replaced partially or completely by fresh duckweed in the growing period. There were no significant differences in daily weight gains between the crossbred ducks fed the diet with 100% duckweed replacing soyabeans and the conventional diet. The gains were significantly higher (P<0.001) for the ducks fed 30 and 45% soyabeans replaced by duckweed. Feed conversion ratios (FCR) were significantly inferior in all diets with duckweed. There were no significant differences in the gains between female Muscovy ducks fed the diet with 56% and 100% duckweed replacing soyabeans and the conventional diet. However, the daily gains were significantly lower with 47% and complete replacement for the male Muscovy ducks. The FCRs tended to be inferior for the duckweed diets. There were no significant differences in carcass traits between treatments for the crossbred, and the female and male Muscovy ducks. 

Two experiments were conducted with improved common ducks and female Muscovy ducks at the Cantho University research station. The ducks were fed levels of 80 or 60 g/duck/day of broken rice and duckweed ad-libitum from 28 to 63 days of age for the common ducks and 28-70 days for the females. Daily gains were significantly lower with the restricted broken rice diets, except for the 80 g/day broken rice diet for common ducks. The FCRs were significantly improved in the restricted broken rice diets. Complete replacement by duckweed in the diet with 60 g/day broken rice had the lowest feed cost. 

An experiment was carried out using scavenging ducks on farms in the rural area. The ducks were given supplements consisting of a mixture of broken rice and dried fish meal, or broken rice and dried fish meal alone. These diets were fed to crossbred scavenging ducks from 28 to 70 days of age at night in the farmers' households. The liveweight gains were significantly higher for the fish meal and broken rice mixture than for the broken rice diets. However, the cost per kg gain for these diets were higher compared with no supplement. 

Key words: Crossbred ducks, Muscovy ducks, duckweed, soyabean, daily gain, intake, local resources. 


Introduction 

There are around 30 million ducks raised annually in Vietnam, of which some 65% are estimated to be in the Mekong Delta. In the countryside the ducks are raised by scavenging in the rice fields especially in the harvesting season and immediately after. In other systems the ducks are raised in the backyard or in the gardens of households or kept on the canals. Ducks are easy to raise and develop in the area because they can resist diseases and consume many kinds of different feeds to produce valuable products in a short time. Duck production has contributed a considerable amount to the income of households. However, nowadays many varieties of high yielding rice are planted and harvested in a short period with only a limited time available for the duck flocks to scavenge, so this system is becoming less feasible. Also, in the dry season the farmers cannot herd their ducks in the fields as there is no feed. Another constraint is that the law of the country now prohibits the farmers from keeping their ducks on the canals and rivers so as to eliminate environmental pollution. As a result, the population of ducks has decreased and this leads to fluctuations in the supply of meat and eggs. In order to meet the increasing demand of the consumers there is increasing interest in confinement of ducks making use of locally available feeds. 

The population of Muscovy ducks is about 20% of the total duck population raised in the Delta. The ducks are commonly allowed to roam around in the backyards and gardens or confined in simple enclosures around farmer households, and today raising has become especially popular around the cities. Muscovy ducks are easy to raise because they are more resistant to diseases and efficiently consume different feeds to produce valuable products that can be sold at high prices. In the integrated animals-pond-garden farming system Muscovy ducks are suitable to raised due to the fact that they are less active, not noisy and easy to breed and manage. 

Duckweed, (Lemna minor) which is common throughout the Delta, is a tiny water plant that grows very well on stagnant pond surfaces. It can tolerate high nutrient stress, and appears to be more resistant to pests and diseases than other aquatic plants in the area. It has a high content of nutrients, especially protein (26-40% of dry matter) and carotene, that are necessary for growing animals. Duckweed has been commonly used in Vietnam to feed fish and poultry. So, as part of the overall development strategy of the integrated farming system, duckweed can be a useful candidate to be developed as a feed resource for ducks so as to improve production all the year round. 

The main objectives of these experiments therefore were to determine the optimum levels of duckweed as replacement for soyabeans in diets for fattening crossbred meat-type and Muscovy ducks based on broken rice fed ad-libitum, and evaluate effects on carcass quality. In addition, the economic benefits obtained from the use of duckweed were calculated. Feed supplementation for scavenging ducks was investigated in order to bring about improvements in the traditional duck-rice integrated farming system. 

Trials with duckweed in diets based on broken rice offered ad-libitum 

Methods and materials 

Experiment 1 was carried out at the Experimental Duck Farm, Cantho University in the Mekong Delta between March and May 1995, in the late dry and early rainy season. A total of two hundred four-week old crossbred ducklings [female Pekin (imported a long time ago) X male Cherry Valley (Czechoslovakia)] with initial average liveweights of between 830 and 860 g were used in the trial. The one day old ducklings were selected from scavenging breeding flocks and incubated at the traditional duck hatchery of Omon district, Cantho province, then brooded and fed a conventional diet ad-libitum from 1 to 28 days of age at the experimental farm. The birds were identified and then individually weighed initially, weekly and at slaughter. They were allocated at random to the five treatments with four replicates and ten birds balanced for sex per replicate. 

Experiment 2 was carried out on a small farm in the suburbs of Cantho town where Muscovy ducks are commonly raised. The experiment was  conducted between May and July 1995, in the early rainy season. One hundred and twenty 4-week old local Muscovy ducklings (sixty females and ixty males) were used, with six treatments (three for each sex) and four replicates of five ducks per replicate. The one day old Muscovy ducklings were selected from clusters of small breeding flocks scavenging in the backyards and gardens of small holdings. They were brooded in a shed built in a garden and fed conventional diets ad-libitum from 1 to 28 days of age. The experimental birds were identified and then individually weighed initially, weekly and at periodic slaughters of 70 days for the females and 84 days for the males. All ducks were given the duck plague vaccine and given a dosage of antibiotics on the seventh and twenty-fifth day of age to prevent diseases. 

The ducks in experiment 1 were fed in groups with 10 ducks per group from 28 to 63 days old on broken rice based diets offered ad-libitum as the major energy source. Based on the protein intake from broken rice, protein from roasted soyabeans was supplemented to balance the protein in the diets. Soyabeans in the experimental diets was replaced by fresh duckweed ad-libitum at levels of 30, 45, 60 or 100%, compared to no replacement (control). 

The Muscovy ducks in experiment 2 were kept in groups of 5 ducks separated from 28 to 70 days old for females and 28 - 84 days old for males and fed diets based on broken rice ad-libitum as the major energy source. Roasted soyabeans were supplemented to balance protein requirements of the control ducks. Based on the control diet, replacement of 60 or 100% soyabeans by duckweed ad-libitum in the experimental diets were fed to the females and males, respectively. 

A premix containing trace minerals and vitamins, and common salt was mixed (0.25%) with the control diet (but not in the other diets) for both experiments 1 and 2. 

Duckweed used in the experiments was grown on ponds enriched with nutrients from effluent from biodigesters and home wastewater. Duck-weed was collected twice daily in the morning and in the afternoon. Before feeding it was cleaned by tap water and put in a big bamboo basket for one hour to drain the excess water from the duckweed to reduce bulk. 

Results and discussion 

 Experiment 1 

The chemical compositions of the duckweed, broken rice and roasted whole soyabeans as analysed at Cantho University were as follows: DM content 4.7%, on DM basis: CP (N*6.25) 38.6%; EE, 9.8%; NFE, 8.58%; CF, 18.7%; ash, 19% and carotene 1025 mg/kg DM. The broken rice was collected from the rice mill of an identical lot and preserved during the experiment. The sample analysed had the following chemical composition: DM, 86.79%; CP, 8.25%; EE, 1.24%; NFE, 69.77%; CF, 1.75% and ash 1.00%.The whole soyabean seeds were roasted to eliminate the anti-nutritional factors, and ground and had the following chemical composition: DM, 87.01%; CP, 38.3%; EE, 18.3%; NFE, 14%; CF, 8.5% and ash 4.9%. The effects of dietary treatment on feed and protein intakes are shown in table 1. 
 

Table 1. Intake of dietary ingredients, dry matter (DM) and crude protein (CP) 
 
D0 D30 D45 D60 D100 SE/Prob
Feed intake, g/d
Broken rice 82 78 83 82 92 1.31/0.001
Roasted soyabeans 27 19 15 12 0
Fresh duckweed 0 496 499 505 566 4.88/0.001
Premix and salt 0.25 0 0 0 0
Total DM 94.7 108 108 105 107 1.11/0.001
Total N*6.25 17.1 22.7 21.6 20.6 17.9 0.16/0.001
The duckweed was consumed readily on all treatments from D30 to D100. The intake of broken rice was depressed slightly on the diet with 70% of the control level of soyabeans (D30) and increased when no soyabeans were given (D100). The intake of duckweed increased as the soyabeans were restricted, reaching an average of 560 g/day. These levels of intake are higher than those (434 to 450 g/day) recorded at Cantho University research station by Becerra et al. (1995) for ducks in a similar trial but fed with reconstituted sugar cane juice instead of broken rice. This may be a reflection of the use in our experiment of duckweed grown on ponds fertilized with slurry from the biodigester-pigsty system which resulted in a higher protein content (38.6% in dry matter compared with 26.3%). Total intake of protein was highest on the 70% soyabean level (D30) and least on the control and D100 diets. 
Table 2. Liveweights, growth and conversion rates of ducks fed duckweed 
as replacement for soyabeans in basal diets of broken rice 
 
D0 D30 D45 D60 D100 SE/Prob
Live weight, g
Initial 859 851 830 859 842 11.9/0.37
Final 1771 1869 1822 1807 1806 22.6/0.05
Daily gain 26.1 29.1 28.3 27.1 27.6 0.57/0.003
Feed conversion (DM) 3.70 4.21 4.23 4.11 4.17 0.04/0.001
 

The rate of liveweight gain was significantly higher on the D30 and D45 diets than on the control diet. The diet with complete replacement of the soyabeans (D100) supported slightly better (ns) growth than the control diet. Feed conversion was best on the control diet and did not differ between the diets containing duckweed. 

Mean values for carcass traits are given in table 3. The weights of chest and thigh muscle tended to be higher on the control diet. There were no differences in weights of the components of the digestive tract nor of the heart and liver. 
 

Table 3. Mean values for carcass traits of ducks given duckweed 
as replacement for soyabeans in diets based on broken rice 
D0 D30 D45 D60 D100 SE/Prob
Slaughter live weight, g 1870 1865 1851 1819 1821 28.1/0.58
Carcass weight, g 1253 1219 1211 1175 1198 25.8/0.31
Carcass yield, % 73.5 72.5 72.6 72.2 72.8 0.79/0.83
Chest muscle, g 203 166 183 164 175 10.1/0.07
Thigh muscle, g 162 156 141 156 153 6.85/0.25
Heart, g 14 12 14 12 14 1.01/0.49
Liver, g 61 61 56 59 61 2.84/0.71
Gizzard, g 55 52 52 57 56 2.26/0.51
Small intestine, cm 188 186 186 190 191 4.49/0.88
Large intestine, cm 12 13 13 12 13 0.58/0.36
Caecum, cm 34 36 34 36 34 1.16/0.46
 
Table 4. Estimates of feed costs assuming situations of purchase 
or farm-based production of duckweed (in VND; about 11,000VND=1US$) 
D0 D30 D45 D60 D100
Feed cost/kg gain
Duckweed purchased* 11,589 13,364 12,866 12,267 10,923
Duckweed grown by farmer** 11,589 9,492 8,952 8,310 6,498
 * Based on prices per kg for roasted soyabeans 5,400, broken rice 1,800, fresh duckweed 200, premix 36,000 and salt 1,000 
**Assumes no cost of duckweed as opportunity cost of family household labour (women and children) is usually zero 

There would appear to be marked economic benefits to the farmer from using duckweed to replace soyabeans in broken rice diets for fattening ducks in situations where the duckweed is grown on the farm and man-aged and harvested by household labour (table 4). This emphasises the importance of an integrated farming system as a means of reducing costs and improving the economic competitiveness of the small scale farmer. 

Experiment 2  

Data for feed intake are given in table 5. The duckweed was consumed readily on the Df0, Df60, Dm60 and Dm100 diets. The intakes of duckweed were higher on the Df100 and Dm100 diets than those of Df60 and Dm60, respectively, and the males consumed more than females. Intake was con-siderably increased as the soyabean was completely replaced by duckweed (297g to 323g for the females and 490 to 540 g for males), but the levels of intakes were lower than those of common ducks (540 vs 560) reported by Men et al. (unpublished) under the same feeding conditions. From the data it can be seen that common ducks, especially the improved local breed when herded, consumed higher levels of duckweed than Muscovies. The intake of broken rice decreased on the Df60 and Dm60 diets, with 40% of the control level of soybeans, and increased when no soybeans were given (Df100 and Dm100). Like for duckweed, the intakes of broken rice were higher for the males than for the females. 
 

Table 5. Intakes of dietary ingredients, dry matter (DM) and crude protein (CP) 
Df0 Df45 Df100 Dm0 Dm45 Dm100 SE/Prob
Feed intake, g/d
  28-70 days of age
Broken rice 77 78 86 106 91 105 1.43/0.001
Roasted SBM 25 11 0 29 16 0
Duckweed 0 297 323 0 490 540
Premix + salt 0.25 0 0 0.30 0 0
  28-84 days of age
Broken rice - - - 115 99 109 1.60/0.001
Roasted SBM - - - 28.5 15.2 0
Duckweed - - - 0 522 569
Total DM
28-70 days 88 91 90 117 115 116 1.34/0.001
28-84 days - - - 125 124 122 1.52/0.276
Total N*6.25
28-70 days 16 16 13 20 22 18 1.19/0.001
28-84 days - - - 20.4 23.5 19.3 0.21/0.001
 
Table 6. Live weights, daily gains and feed conversion rates of Muscovy ducks 
Df0 Df45 Df100 Dm0 Dm45 Dm100 SE/Prob
Live weight, g
Initial 657 619 650 787 758 775 23.09/0.001
Final
70 days of age 1638 1563 1563 2303 1946 1935 36.71/0.001
84 days of age - - - 2713 2391 2393 43.54/0.001
Daily gain, g
28-70 days 23.4 22.5 21.7 36.1 28.3 27.6 0.83/0.001
28-84 days - - - 34.4 29.2 28.9 0.75/0.001
Feed conversion (DM)
28-70 days 3.7 4.06 4.17 3.24 4.12 4.23 0.16/0.003
28-84 days - - - 3.64 4.27 4.21 0.11/0.004
 

The rate of weight gain was slightly higher on the Df0 diet than on Df60 and Df100 diets, but there was no significant difference for females (23.4 vs 22.5 and 21.7), whereas the gain was significantly higher on the Dm0 diet than on the Dm60 and Dm100 diets for males. The results also show that use of high amounts of duckweed to replace most or all soyabeans in broken rice based diets for fattening male Muscovies, which have a high potential growth rate, decreased weight gains. So whether the high duckweed diets can be fed male Muscovies for breeding needs to be investigated. 
 

Table 7. Mean values for carcass traits of Muscovy ducks given duckweed as 
replacement for soyabean in broken rice based diets 
Df0 Df60 Df100 Dm0 Dm60 Dm100 SE/Prob
Females at 70 days of age
Live weight, g 1641 1548 1572 25.12/0.066
carcass weight, g 73.1 70.1 71.1 0.91/0.109
Chest muscles, g 168 167 168 6.25/0.984
Thigh muscle, g 164 148 156 9.37/0.489
Heart, g 9.5 9.6 9.9 0.33/0.721
Liver, g 38 42 43 3.14/0.505
Males at 84 days of age
Live weight, g 2758 2451 2495 88.06/0.074
Carcass weight, g 70.0 70.6 68.1 1.17/0.336
Chest muscle, g 277 290 275 13.40/0.701
Thigh muscles, g 272 243 246 9.52/0.102
Heart, g 15.0 13.4 12.6 0.54/0.033
Liver, g 72.0 76.4 78.4 3.82/0.140
 

Mean values for carcass traits are given in table 7. The carcass yield and thigh muscle tended to be higher on the control diets for both the females and males. There were no significant differences in weights of the components of the digestive tract except the hearts of the males. 

 
Table 8. Estimates of feed costs assuming situations of purchase or farm based production 
of duckweed (VND; about 11,000VND=1US$) 
Df0 Df60 Df100 Dm0 Dm60 Dm100
Fed cost/kg gain
Duckweed purchased 11,574 11,563 10,132 10,499 12,532 10,736
Duckweed grown by farmers 11,574   8,922   7,156 10,499   8,755   6,797
 
If the farmers use the family household labour and the waste water surfaces to grow duckweed for the substitution of soyabeans in broken rice based diets for feeding Muscovies, they can get clear economic benefits. This is very important for improving living standards and opening up the possibility of an efficient solution for the use of the enormous surplus labour force in the rural areas, especially in the case of the poor farmers. 

From the results of experiment 1 it can be seen that fresh duckweed can completely replace roasted soyabeans and a vitamin-mineral premix in broken rice based diets for fattening ducks without any reduction in growth performance or carcass traits. The poorer feed conversion on the diets containing duckweed has no economic significance, as shown in table 4 since duckweed can be grown easily on the farm whereas soyabeans usually have to be purchased. The fact that protein yields of duckweed can be as high as 10 tonnes/ha/year (Preston, 1995) compared with less than one tonne/ha/year for soyabean protein is another advantage for the integrated farming system. 

The results of experiment 2 for small farms show that farmers can grow duckweed in an integrated farming system and use it to replace soyabeans and mineral-vitamin premixes completely in broken rice based diets for fattening female Muscovy ducks without any reduction in growth performance and carcass quality. However, when feeding male muscovies with high genetic potential for growth, the complete replacement of duckweed in broken rice based diets reduced weight gain, but the gain was still higher than that of the traditional methods. Replacement with duckweed can be applied in feeding muscovies in the early developer stage because normal growth is possible and inputs can be reduced in the long term. 

Trials with duckweed in restricted broken rice based diets  

Experiments 3 & 4 

Methods and materials  

Two similar experiments were carried out with 54 common ducks fed duckweed from 28 to 63 days of age and 45 local female Muscovy ducks from 28 to 70 days of age on the experimental farm of Cantho University. The trials included three treatments and three replicates. The diets are shown in table 9. 
 

Table 9. Experimental diets 
Treatment Broken rice* duckweed*
Mixed common ducks
Ba Ad-libitum  Ad-libitum 
B80 80 Ad-libitum 
B60 60 Ad-libitum 
Female Muscovy ducks 
Bma Ad-libitum  Ad-libitum 
Bm80 80 Ad-libitum 
Bm60 60 Ad-libitum 
* Feed ingredients, g/day/duck

The broken rice analysed had DM 86.9% and CP 9.6% of DM and the duckweed had DM 4.9% and CP 39.3% of DM. 

Results and discussion  

Data for feed intakes are given in table 10. 
 

Table 10. Intake of dietary ingredients, dry matter (DM) and crude protein (CP) 
 
Treatment *Broken rice *Duckweed *Total DM *Total CP
Mixed common duck 
Ba 101 765 125 23
B80 78 817 107 22
B60 60 869 94 22
P-value 0.001 0.001 0.001 0.05
Female Muscovy duck 
Bma 104 318 106 15
Bm80 77 324 82 13
Bm60 57 333 66 11
P-value 0.001 0.458 0.001 0.001
* Feed ingredients, g/day/duck
 

The daily intake of duckweed increased as the broken rice was restricted reaching a maximum of 1100 g at 6 weeks of age, which was equivalent to the ducks' own live weights. These levels of intake are higher than those (870 to 560 g) recorded in the report by Men et al. (unpublished) for ducks in a similar feeding trial, but of a different crossbred line. Total intake of protein was slightly decreased on the B60 diet. Total intake of DM was highest on the ad-libitum broken rice diets and least on the B60 diet. The daily intake of duckweed by the female Muscovy ducks increased slightly as the broken rice was restricted, reaching an average of 333g. The level of intake is lower than that (333 vs 870 g) recorded in trial 1 with common ducks. Total intake of DM on the Bm60 diet was lowest (66 vs 106 g for Bma), and was lower than that of common ducks (66 vs 94g). The intake of broken rice was lower than the amount offered because in the first week of the experiment the ducks consumed less feed than was expected. 

 
Table 11. Live weights, daily gains and conversion rates of common and 
female Muscovy ducks fed restricted broken rice with duckweed ad-libitum 
Treatment
Live weight, g
Initial
Live weight, g
Final
Daily gain, g Conversion, DM
Mixed common duck
Ba 694 1595 25.8 4.87
B80 686 1537 24.3 4.44
B60 674 1369 19.9 4.77
P value 0.858 0.001 0.001 0.015
Female Muscovy duck
Bma 639 1681 24.8 4.3
Bm80 646 1483 19.9 4.2
Bm60 644 1388 17.7 3.7
P value 0.969 0.001 0.001 0.018
 

The daily gain males was gradually decreased as the levels of broken rice were reduced, although there was no significant difference between Ba and B80. The gain was lowest for the B60 diet and significantly different when compared with Ba and B80. Feed conversion was best for the B80 diet, but no difference was found between Ba and B60 diets. 

With female Muscovy ducks, the daily gains significantly decreased on the restricted broken rice diets compared with the Bma (control). The gains on the Bma diet is equivalent with that on Ba diet in trial 1. The efficiency of feed conversion of female Muscovies is better than that of common ducks on the same diets. 

The results of experiment 3 show that when the price of broken rice is high, providing 80g daily of broken rice for improved ducks given duckweed ad-libitum gives good growth and carcass traits. Growing duckweed for ducks saves capital and can help to solve unemployment in the area. The results of experiment 4 show that levels of 80g broken rice per duck per day and duckweed ad-libitum for fattening female Muscovies decreased their weight gains because the ability of muscovies to consume fresh duckweed is lower than that of common ducks. The Bm80 diet can be used for developers because in this period breeding ducks are not grown so rapidly, but the effects on reproduction need to be investigated. Effect of energy and protein supplementation of scavenging ducks raised in paddy rice fields 

Methods and materials  

A total of 800 crossbred Cherry Valley ducklings were brooded and trained to scavenge from 1-28 days of age in the farmer households of a hamlet of Cantho province. After brooding the ducks were divided into 4 flocks with 190 ducks in each and were herded and managed by 4 farmer households. The ducks were let loose in rice fields post harvest from 6.00 h to 17.30 h daily. There were 3 supplemental diets: 50 g/day of a mixture of broken rice and dried fish meal (BFM) for flock 1, 50 g/day broken rice (BR) for flock 2 and 20 g dried fish meal (FM) for flock 3 and compared to no supplementary feed (S0) for flock 4 (control). These diets were given to the ducks from 28 to 70 days of age and given in the evening. At the end of the trial, four ducks (2 males and 2 females) from each flock were slaughtered for carcass evaluation. 

Results and discussions  

Data from table 12 show that, although having the lowest initial live weight, weight gains of ducks given BFM supplementary feeds were higher that of the unsupplemented flock, and were highest from flock 1 to flock 3. Weight gains were significantly higher for flock 1 and for flock 2 than for flock 3 and flock 4. The feed conversions were higher for flock 1 and flock 2, and the costs per kg gain are highest for flock 1, followed by flock 2 and 3. The flock 1 ducks began moulting at 63 days of age, while flock 4 still had the original plumage at 70 days of age. Ducks with full plumage sold at a higher price (12%) than those in flock 4. However, all four flocks were in much better condition than flocks fed and managed by the traditional methods of the farmers in the hamlet. Over the same time period and with the same breed reared, several local farmers finished their ducks at 75 days of age, with average live weights from only 1.2 to 1.3 kg and with poor quality carcases. 

 
Table 12. Mean value for live weights, daily gains 
and conversion rates of ducks supplemented feeds 
Item Flock 1  
(BFM)
Flock 2  
(BR)
Flock 3  
(FM)
Flock 4  
(S0)
SE/Prob
Live weight, g 
Initial 431 485 480 453 4.94/0.001
Final 1855 1749 1659 1592 13.25/0.001
Daily gain, g 33.9 30.1 28.1 27.1 4.88/0.001
Feed conversion (DM) of  
supplement feed 
In the day (b.rice) 1.00 1.12 1.20 1.25
At night 1.28 1.45 0.46 0
feed cost / kg gain*
(VND=1/11000USD) 5139 5027 4457 2446
* Based on of dried fish, 4,000, broken rice, 1700 VND per kg. 

Mean values for carcass traits are given in table 13. Live weights at slaughter, carcass weights and yields, and chest muscle tended to be higher for flocks 1 and 2. There were no significant differences in the weights and the lengths of the digestive tract components, except the liver. 

 
Table 13. Mean values for carcass traits of herded ducks supplemented different feeds 
Item  Flock 1 
(BFM)
Flock 2 
(BM)
Flock 3 
(FM)
Flock 4 
(S0)
SE/Prob
Slaughter liveweight, g 1862 1743 1655 1573 62.43/0.024
Carcass weight, g 1267 1218 1118 1058 40.72/0.007
Carcass yield, %  68.0 70.0 67.6 67.3 0.72/0.065
Chest muscle, g 150 140 118 114 8.30/0.018
Thigh muscles, g 168 167 158 140 8.08/0.09
Heart, g 11.8 11.8 10.3 10.3 0.50/0.071
Liver, g 68.3 58.3 51.0 54.8 3.80/0.026
Gizzard, g 63.3 60.3 67 60.0 3.48/0.471
Small intestine, cm 191 192 191 181 6.70/0.624
Large intestine, cm 10.8 10.6 10.81 9.3 0.46/0.109
Caeca, cm 33.4 33.3 32.3 32.6 1.49/0.936
 

From the results of the experiment it is clear that supplements of protein-energy feeds to growing crossbred meat ducks improved the daily liveweight gains and carcass quality, and shortened the raising time. Supplementation is simple to carry out, and an improvement of the traditional scavenging system, and the method meets the increasing demand of the consumers for better quality products. 

Discussion and conclusion  

From the results of the four experiments it can be seen that fresh duckweed, a locally available unconventional feed source, can completely replace soyabeans in broken rice based diets for fattening crossbred Common ducks and female Muscovy ducks without any problems regarding daily live weight gains, carcass quality and marketing. Replacement decreased the investment by using available wastewater and household labour for managing and collecting duckweed, and increased the economic benefits for the farmers. Carcasses of ducks given duckweed are an attractive yellow colour due to storage in the body of carotenes. However, complete replacement of duckweed in diets for male Muscovy ducks with a genetic potential for high growth rate tended to decrease the weight gain. The high protein content of cultivated duckweed is important because the ducks need to consume large amounts due to the low DM content of duckweed. In fact, growing duckweed is easy for farmers in the Mekong Delta, because the region is an alluvial lowland plain with an inexhaustible water supply and large amounts of decaying organic matter and human wastewater. These conditions make growing duckweed in integrated farming systems very profitable not only for animal feed but also for the treatment of wastewater from animals and humans. Also, this contributes to solving one of the environmental problems that have concerned the government. 

An interesting and important observation is the relative capacity of the Common duck breed, compared with the Muscovy duck, to consume duck weed. A strict comparison of the two breeds is not possible as they were not included in the same experiment. The data in table 14 shows the comparison between the breeds on the two main feeding systems: ad libitum or restricted broken rice (confounded with sex in the first case and with location in the second). When the broken rice was restricted, the Common ducks ate almost twice the amount of duck weed as the Muscovy ducks (P=0.001), and even when the rice was given ad libitum the intake still tended (P=0.14) to be higher for the Common ducks. The economy of liveweight gain (feed cost/unit LW gain) was best on the restricted rice system, although the rate of gain was slightly lower, and in each case the Common ducks were better than the Muscovy breed. Differences between pig breeds were also observed by Rodriguez (1996) when duckweed was the major protein source; the local Mong Cai breed appeared to be able to consume more of this feed than the exotic (Large White) breed. As stated earlier, it was not the aim of the experiments to make a strict comparison of the breeds, hence the confounding with location and/or sex. Nevertheless, the observations are interesting and provide a strong justification for future research when the aim is to maximise use of local feeds such as duckweed. The most effective way of maintaining biodiversity is by showing that local (indigenous) breeds may have distinct comparative advantages when local feed resources are used. 

Table 14. Comparison of Muscovy and Common duck breeds when fed duckweed 
and either restricted or ad-libitum broken rice 
 
Common Muscovy SE Prob
Restricted rice 
Location Station Station
Sex Mixed Female
Live weight, g
Initial  685 643
Final 1500 1517
Daily gain* 20 18
Intake fresh duckweed
g/day 817 325
g/g LW 0.75 0.30 0.039 0.001
Feed cost, VND/kg gain 5427 5796
Ad libitum rice
Location Station Farm
Sex Mixed Mixed
Live weight, g
Initial 845 700
Final 1826 1751
Daily gain 28 23
Intake fresh duck weed
g/day 517 413
g/g LW 0.39 0.33 0.023 0.14
Feed cost, VND/kg gain 6500 6900
 

Supplementary feeding for scavenging ducks is an improvement of traditional production to improve growth rates and quality of meat ducks. It is a reasonable method to shorten raising time and keep the duck population stable, as with modern rice cultivation opportunities for duck flocks to scavenge are limited. Supplementing 50 g of a broken rice and dried fish meal mixture, or 50 g broken rice per bird per night for herded duck flocks showed that daily weight gains could be improved and also rearing time could be reduced. All supplements resulted in high weight gains and carcass weights when compared with other traditionally reared flocks. The 
ducks formed their adult plumage 2 weeks earlier than flocks raised by traditional methods. It is clear that if fed a balanced feed of energy and protein (16.8% CP and 11.74 MJ ME/kg DM) ducks grow faster than those fed broken rice or dried fish alone. However, the supplemental cost for the protein-energy diet was highest because of the high price of broken rice and dried fish meal. The farmer can overcome the problem by using duckweed in an integrated farming system as shown in experiment 1, or by gathering shellfish available in the canals nearby the home for the supplement. 

Acknowledgements  

This research forms part of the programme of study of the senior author for the Master of Science Degree in "Livestock-Based Integrated Farming Systems for Sustainable Use of Renewable Natural Resources", at the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala. Development of the basic experimental facilities were facilitated by a grant from the International Foundation for Science (IFS). I would like to thank Dr Brian Ogle, Dr T. R. Preston and Mr Frands Dolberg for useful guidances and their advisory roles that made this study possible. 

References  

Anon. 1992. Study on the performance of local ducks reared under scavenging condition (Unpublished data), Bangladesh Livestock Research Institute. 

Becerra, M., Ogle, B. and Preston, T. R. 1995. Effect of replacing whole boiled soybeans with Lemna sp in the diets of growing ducks. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 7, Number 3, 44.8 Kb. 

Dean, W. F. 1986. Nutrient requirements of meat-type ducks. Duck Production Science and World Practice. (Ed). Farell, D. J. and Stapleton, P. (Ed). University of New England, pp. 31-57. 

Leclercq, B. and de Carville, H. 1986. Dietary Energy, Protein and Phosphorus Requirements of Muscovy Ducks. Duck Production Science and World Practice. 

Farell, D. J. and Stapleton, P. (Ed). University of New England, pp. 58-69. 

Manda, M. 1992. Paddy Rice Cultivation Using Crossbred Ducks. Farming Japan Vol. 26 - 4, pp. 35-42. 

Men, B.X., Ogle, B and Preston, T.R. (unpublished). Use of restricted rice in duckweed based diets for feeding growing Common and Muscovy Ducks. Cantho University, Vietnam. 

Preston, T. R. 1995. Research, Extension and Training for Sustainable Farming Systems in the Tropics. Livestock Research for Rural Development. Volume 7, Number 2, 84 Kb. 

Rodriguez J., L. (1996). Appropriate use of local resources in integrated farming as a strategy for sustainable agriculture in Central Vietnam. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Uppsala 1996. 

Toung, Naren. 1994. Optimum protein Supply and level of inclusion of water spinach (Ipomoea aquatica) in sugar cane juice based diets for growing ducks. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Department of Animal Nutrition and Management, Uppsala 1994, paper 2, 8pp. 

Vo Ai Quac. 1990. Paper presented at the workshop on sustainable agriculture in the lowland. Sep. 24 - Oct. 7, Bangkok, Thailand. 

Zakaria, A. 1992. Advances on Feeding and Management of Ducks in Indonesia. Sustainable Animal Production: Proceedings of the Sixth AAAP Animal Science Congress, Vol. II. AHAT, Bangkok, pp. 47-53. 

Yeong, S. W. 1986. Utilisation of local feedstuffs in diets of meat and laying ducks in Malaysia. Duck Production Science and World Practice. Farell, D. J. and Stapleton, P. (Ed). University of New England, pp. 323-332. 

Yeong, S. W. 1992. Advances on Feeding and Management of Ducks in Malaysia. Sustainable Animal Production: Proceedings of the Sixth AAAP Animal Science Congress, Vol. II. AHAT, Bangkok, pp. 56-69.