Bjorn Guterstam and Lasse Forsberg. 1998. Demonstrating Ecological Engineering for Wastewater Treatment in a Nordic Climate using Aquaculture Principles in a Greenhouse Mesocosm 

In: Integrated Bio-Systems in Zero Emissions Applications.
Proceedings of the Internet Conference on Integrated Biosystems.
Eds: Eng-Leong Foo & Tarcisio Della Senta. 1998
http://www.ias.unu.edu/proceedings/icibs/bjorn
 
About the Author
Abstract Index to view 
Discussion Messages
Paper download discussion
messages (MSWord7 doc)

About the Author
Bjorn Guterstam and Lasse Forsberg.  
Stensund Ecological Center, Stensund Folk College, S-6191 Trosa, Sweden.  
E-mail: bjorn.guterstam@mbox317.swipnet.se;  lasse.f@mbox200.swipnet.se  

Dr. Bjorn Guterstam is a marine biologist by education and the research leader and initiator of the Stensund Wastewater Aquaculture facility. He got his Ph.D. in 1979 at the Institute of Marine Sciences, Kiel University, Germany.  

Mr. Lasse Forsberg is a fisheries biologist and wastewater engineer and has been in charge of the operation and performance of the R & D activities since 1994. 


Abstract
A demonstration plant for ecologically engineered wastewater treatment was constructed in 1989 as an aquaculture inside a greenhouse,  i.e. a mesocosm, designed for operation in a Nordic climate, at N.Lat. 60, in Sweden. Located on the Baltic Sea coast in Trosa, Stensund Folk College was used as a model community, with 100 person equivalents (p.e.), for the purpose of developing a recycling concept for the wastewater resourses of nitrogen, phosphorus and heat energy. After 4 years of operation, results show that the wastewater from 34 p.e. (0.18m3 per day per person) has been treated in the aquaculture, from January 1990 to January 1994. Based on the total wastewater flow from 100 p.e., the nutrient uptake in the aquaculture was 10% of the nitrogen and 8% of the phosphorus. Source separation of phosphorus, i.e. the phosphorus not used, amounted to 34 %, coming through an increased awareness to using phosphorus-free cleaning agents. The aquaculture's reduction of pathogenic bacteria and organic material gave a treated effuent close to swimming water quality. Metals were reduced by anaerobic treatment, with 48-73 % reduction of the seven identified metals. Energy balances showed a small net energy import during winter, and 19% of the greenhouse's available energy was heat pumped. The costs of aquaculture wastewater treatment still exceed conventional costs, as long as aquaculture products are not counted.