![]() |
|
![]() |
| INTRODUCTION
In addition to population growth, rural and urban migration, the major
features of most Pacific island countries include limited arable land,
poor topography (volcanic soils, slopey land, atolls etc.) and social/economic
isolation within and between island countries. However, agricultural policy
in some countries of the region is geared towards intensification in terms
of crop yield per hectare, output per animal, use of improved breeds of
animals and planting materials, mechanisation, chemical and pesticides
applications. A major by product from the intensification of the livestock
industry is animal waste (faeces) and waste products (bedding and litter
materials). In developed countries such as Canada, U.S.A., New Zealand
and Australia there are by-laws and regulation on the proper disposal and
utlisation of livestock waste. as a result of which waste management is
an integral part of the commercial livestock industry. methods of
utilisation include use for energy (biogas), fertilizer, animal feed and
aquaculture. However, in most south pacific island countries, livestock
waste management is still in its infancy or rudimentary stages. For
example many commercial pig producers simply drain pig manure or effluent
into creeks, streams and rivers. To, them, this is the easiest, most efficient,
cheap and practical method of waste disposal. But as a potential pollution
problem, this system of waste disposal is counter productive and wasteful.
Valuable marine resources and underground water are threatened. Also potential
organic fertilizer, livestock feed and energy resource is lost or wasted.
the combination of population in the region, inefficient agricultural practices
and the diminishing capacity of available arable land to sustain his population
growth from the basis for the potential of integrated bio-systems in small
Pacific island countries. To ensure food security and promote economic,
social and ecological benefits within and between island countries, the
sustainable use of natural renewable agricultural resources must be facilitated
by the synergistic relationship between humans, livestock, crops and land.
Nutrient Recycling of Livestock Waste in the South Pacific. Integrated Bio-System. The concept of integrated bio-system is beginning to generate
interest in the region, in particular amongst NGO, colleges and university
with livestock farms. For example at the university of the south pacific,
college of agriculture samoa, the author is in the process of integrating
pig production, tilapia farming and biogas production. The unit is based
on the designed at Montforts Boy’s Town Fiji, by Professor George Chan
an Environmental Engineering consultant with the United Nations University.
An overview of a proposed model is shown in Figure 1 and 2. This system
can provide all the means of production for high yield of fish, livestock,
crops and processed good at very competitive prices, and no pollution (Chan,
1997). Recently, Doelle, (1997) stated that the bioconversion of animal
and domestic biological waste into non-polluting biogas and biofertiliser
is also very important from a public health stand point of view, by the
elimination of enteric parasites and micro-organisms through anaerobic
digestion process.
The major component of organic agriculture in the region is the use
of livestock waste in crop production. The term livestock manure refers
to a mixture of animal waste or effluent, which consist of voided undigested
feed materials (faeces), urine (polygastic and pigs), bedding and litter
materials. The quality and composition of livestock manure depends on factors
such as, type of animal, age, weight, feed and type of bedding/litter materials
(Figure 3 and Table 1). The major elements in the manure and urine of livestock
are nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium (Table 2).
Table 1: Composition of value of chicken manure, fresh vs different
degrees of dryness1 (Source: Ensminger, M.
2 calculated on the following retail price per pound basis nitrogen (N) 25 cts, P2O5 20 cts and K2O 10 cts 3 the volume-weight relationship may vary considerably at the lower moisture content due to handling compaction and biological decomposition
The major sources of water are urine and external water (washing, cleaning water, etc.). The inorganic fraction consist mainly of minerals such as potassium and phosphorous with major sources as undigested feed, beddings/litter materials and urine. Use of Livestock Manure in Organic Agriculture Livestock waste if properly conserved is rich in organic and inorganic materials. Historically it has been used primarily as fertilizer. A number of farmers in North America and Western Europe including Australia and New Zealand are returning to organic farming, thus increasing the economic value of livestock waste. In Fiji and Samoa some vegetable growers are changing to organic farming because of the reduced cost of production and price advantage of organically grown fruits and vegetable over that produced from chemical fertilizer. Studies carried out in the United States (Ensminger, 1980) has shown that 5 to 20 tons of poultry manure could be applied to one acre year after year with benefits, and greater than 20 tons application could also be made, but probably should not be repeated every year, since excess rates will lead to salt and nitrate build-up, polluting streams and ground water resulting in toxic level of nitrate in crops. Ensminger (1980) concluded that maximum rate of application should be based on soil type, rainfall and temperature. Based on commercial pig and poultry population from six countries in the region (Fiji, Samoa, Tonga, Solomon Islands, Vanuatu and Cook Islands), it is noteworthy to state that the estimated manure output for 1991 was 83 tons per day for chicken and 299 tons per day for pigs (Ajuyah, 1996). It will be worthwhile to calculate the actual monetary value of livestock manure in relation to equivalent amount of chemical fertilizer and N, P2O5 and K2O content. Precautions When Using Manure as Fertilizer Ensminger (1980) highlighted that the following precautions should be observed when using livestock manure in organic agriculture: (i) Poultry manure should be properly handled, to prevent putrefaction.
With poor handling much of the uric acid will be changed to ammonium carbonate,
with consequent loss of fertilizing value (note: birds excreta contain
more nitrogen (uric acid) than that from other animals).
Conclusion The economic and social potential of livestock in Organic Agriculture has long been known. Livestock manure is produced whether or not it is wanted and may be available at only the cost of handling. For example at the USP/SOA Poultry farm a 45 kg of poultry manure (droppings and litter materials - wood shavings) is sold at WS$4-5. However, in recent years, health and pollution concern has created a "niche market" for organically grown produce, in particular fruits and vegetables. Some consumers are prepared to pay premium prices for food grown without chemical fertilizer, pesticides and weedicides. In the future, the economic value of livestock manure will increase, and it will be looked upon as a resource not as a waste product that presents disposal problems (Ensminger, 1980). More and more livestock manure will be used as fertilizer to produce food for the expending market for organically grown produce. However, more research is still needed in the South Pacific region to determine the amount of manure per hectare without depressing crop yield, creating salt problems in soil, and nitrate problems in feed, ground water or surface streams. References Ajuyah, A. O. (1996). AG 273. Livestock Production I Course Book I and 2. Published by University Extension. The University of the South Pacific. Ensminger, M. E. ( 1980). Poultry Manure. In Poultry Science (Animal Agriculture Series). Published by Intestate Printers and Publishers, Inc. USA. Kangmin, L. ( 1997). Integration of Aquaculture into Macro-Agriculture. Presented at the UNDP/UNU Integrated Biomass System Workshop. Suva, Fiji, May 5-9, 1997. |